Echo CS-680 vs Stihl MS 391
Tinted cells mark the better figure on that row alone: more engine, longer bar, lighter, cheaper. A lighter weight is only a win on the same basis.
What owners like and complain about
Echo CS-680
- 66.8cc with a low, torquey power delivery owners describe as built like saws used to be
- Adjustable oiler with a manual override — genuinely useful running long bars in dry hardwood
- Rim sprocket, aluminium handle with rubber grip and PowerMatch bar are proper pro-grade parts
- Top-mounted tool-less air filter cover keeps in-field servicing quick
- Takes bars up to 27 inches, covering real felling work
- 5-year consumer warranty on a saw in this class
- Owners who have run both say the lighter CS-620P out-cuts it with anything under a 24-inch bar
- 14.6 lb powerhead and a slow-revving character make it tiring next to modern 70cc saws
- Plastic sprocket cover where the cheaper CS-620P gets magnesium
- An older design that Echo has not refreshed alongside the X Series saws
- $779.99-$799.99 puts it above the CS-620P with no clear advantage below a 24-inch bar
Stihl MS 391
- Biggest engine in Stihl's farm range — 3.3 kW handles a 25" bar and large-diameter felling
- Owners report ten-year service lives in homeowner use
- IntelliCarb and pre-separation filtration hold mixture steady as the filter loads
- Bumper spikes, side-access tensioner and toolless caps — easy to work around in the field
- About $270 less than an MS 362 C-M while out-displacing it
- Glued transfer-port covers are a documented long-term air-leak path, and owners report piston destruction when one lets go
- 13.8 lb powerhead — heavier than the pro MS 362 C-M, which makes more power
- Long-term users describe it as awkward to work on compared with the pro chassis saws
- Does not hold up under commercial use; owners who cut for pay move to the 362 or 400
- No M-Tronic at $840

