Husqvarna 564 XP Fuel Injected vs Stihl MS 400 C-M
Tinted cells mark the better figure on that row alone: more engine, longer bar, lighter, cheaper. A lighter weight is only a win on the same basis.
What owners like and complain about
Husqvarna 564 XP Fuel Injected
- 5.4 hp from 62.4cc at 12.8 lb — more power and less weight than the 562 XP Mark II
- Fuel injection removes the choke routine and gives consistent starting hot or cold
- Husqvarna rates it the lowest-vibration gas saw it makes, which matters over a full day
- Air Injection pre-cleaner removes 98% of incoming dust before the filter
- Rated to a 28-inch bar with .058 C85 chain standard
- Rear AV damper, captive clutch-cover nuts and raised felling sights are real working-detail upgrades
- $1,230 is a $280 premium over the 562 XP Mark II for roughly 0.7 hp
- First-generation injection system with no long-term field record yet
- Fuel-system faults mean a dealer with diagnostics — there is no carb to adjust in the field
- Still a 60cc-class saw; 36-inch bar work belongs to the 585 or 592 XP
Stihl MS 400 C-M
- 4.0 kW from 66.8cc at 12.7 lb — out-powers the heavier MS 391 and out-pulls the MS 362 C-M
- Magnesium piston is 25% lighter than aluminium, which is what lets it accelerate like a smaller saw
- M-Tronic on this platform is the version owners consider sorted
- HD2 air filter plus pre-separation stretches cleaning intervals through full days in dusty felling
- Rated for 16" to 25" bars, so one saw covers felling and bucking
- $1,250 — $410 more than an MS 391 of similar displacement
- Long-term durability of the magnesium piston is genuinely unproven; owners say so openly
- M-Tronic faults still need a dealer diagnostic tool, not a screwdriver
- 3-month warranty if you earn money with it under Stihl's 2026 policy

